Windows 7 screenshots leaked to the web ! |
![]() |
Jan 25 2008, 04:04 AM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Editor in Chief / PR / MCSA ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,711 Joined: 13-November 04 From: GMT -5:00 Member No.: 320 I'm running: something... |
I wonder if us Vista guys will have to pay for this Thankfully, some of them probably will. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 06:10 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Forum Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Forum Guru Posts: 579 Joined: 25-March 06 Member No.: 2,753 I'm running: Windows Vista SP2 |
looks real to me, thx
-------------------- Windows 7 M3 (6.1.6801.0)
Windows Vista SP2 (6.0.6002.16497) |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 08:17 AM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Loyal Member Posts: 264 Joined: 14-November 05 From: Sweden Member No.: 1,240 I'm running: Mac OS X 10.5.7 |
I wonder if us Vista guys will have to pay for this Thankfully, some of them probably will. I wish they wouldn't have to though. I actually don't think it would be a problem, except that some idiots start assuming things about the OS. Like "M1 looks like Vista, so Windows 7 will be almost exactly like Vista!!!". Another theoretical problem could be the stealing of ideas unveiled early, but then again, MS will have quite a head start as they've already started the project and don't lag behind through imitation. I've similarly also not noticed much of any problems in this sense with earlier operating systems. Sure, there were e.g. sidebars early, but I think it's a stretch to assume that's why Vista may have sold worse. -------------------- MacBook Pro, Rev. F • Mac OS X "Leopard" 10.5.8
|
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 08:32 AM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() Mac Fag ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Loyal Member Posts: 271 Joined: 2-September 07 From: Malmoe, Sweden Member No.: 22,894 I'm running: OSX 10.5.7, Fluid OS 0.7.2 |
Idk...
Looking at it, it doesn't seem real. It is almost a carbon copy of vista, with some new numbers. And in the Windows 7 thing, it says 6.1. Kinda doesnt make sense when it is Windows 7, not 6. Also... No one but me finds Windows 7 Ultimate a bit unbelieveable? If this was a M1 release, there would be no ultimate. There would be 1 version. Thats it. Not this Multi-version crap. That's not something you do till the end. In all of the Vista Beta's I tried (when it was Longhorn), I don't remember there being a Longhorn Ultimate right at the beginning. Do you? My vote is fake. I could easily make these "screenshots" in Photoshop, probably in better quality too. But thats just on persons opinion. We are all entitled to our own thoughts. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 09:02 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Loyal Member Posts: 342 Joined: 28-November 04 Member No.: 367 |
QUOTE If this was a M1 release, there would be no ultimate. There would be 1 version. Thats it. Not this Multi-version crap. That's not something you do till the end. In all of the Vista Beta's I tried (when it was Longhorn), I don't remember there being a Longhorn Ultimate right at the beginning. Do you? I remember Longhorn Professional |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 10:34 AM
Post
#21
|
|
![]() Program Manager ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 277 Joined: 24-August 05 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 886 I'm running: Windows 7 PDC Build 6801 |
Idk... Looking at it, it doesn't seem real. It is almost a carbon copy of vista, with some new numbers. And in the Windows 7 thing, it says 6.1. Kinda doesnt make sense when it is Windows 7, not 6. Also... No one but me finds Windows 7 Ultimate a bit unbelieveable? If this was a M1 release, there would be no ultimate. There would be 1 version. Thats it. Not this Multi-version crap. That's not something you do till the end. In all of the Vista Beta's I tried (when it was Longhorn), I don't remember there being a Longhorn Ultimate right at the beginning. Do you? My vote is fake. I could easily make these "screenshots" in Photoshop, probably in better quality too. But thats just on persons opinion. We are all entitled to our own thoughts. Why not? All builds of Vista during beta were Ultimate -------------------- All The Best,
Daniel Daniel Kornev | Program Manager | Microsoft Corporation email: danielko[at]microsoft.com | my blog: Thoughts and Ideas on Semantics and Contexts | our site: Windows Sensor and Location Platform Bringing Context-Aware Applications to life with Windows 7! |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 12:04 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Loyal Member Posts: 264 Joined: 14-November 05 From: Sweden Member No.: 1,240 I'm running: Mac OS X 10.5.7 |
Looking at it, it doesn't seem real. It is almost a carbon copy of vista, with some new numbers. That's why I think it contributes to looking real. It's just a Milestone 1 / "alpha" release. Compare to the Longhorn M1 builds. QUOTE And in the Windows 7 thing, it says 6.1. Kinda doesnt make sense when it is Windows 7, not 6. Who knows, maybe there's been a change of plans along with the new rather "early" H2 2009 plan, or maybe it's the reserved version number until MinWin gets implemented. I heard somewhere that MinWin had still not been readied for inclusion in Windows 7. QUOTE No one but me finds Windows 7 Ultimate a bit unbelieveable? No, I find these things common enough... The SKU's may not have been decided upon yet, and they're probably just re-using graphics from Vista where possible. After all, this release isn't made to look "accurate" or anything. It's just built to have something that works for early feedback. QUOTE If this was a M1 release, there would be no ultimate. It's probably just based on the Vista Ultimate Edition, i.e. not intentionally omitting certain features of the Windows Vista OS, as the other editions are subsets. I don't see much point in doing that anyway, so it seems logical to me that they then based it upon Ultimate, and in not caring for whatever it looks like, just reused the Ultimate branding. And there may indeed just be one edition of Windows 7 yet. There's nothing saying there isn't. I think one need to apply the "alpha mindset" here. Just because we have something odd called Ultimate doesn't automatically mean they have other editions, localized versions, or anything like that. QUOTE I don't remember there being a Longhorn Ultimate right at the beginning. Do you? Now you're thinking forwards instead of thinking backwards. ;) The Ultimate branding belonged to the future, and the SKU's weren't finalized early on in Longhorn, so obviously it wasn't called like that. You need to think backwards in time when looking at early builds of a new Windows OS. You need to remember what OS they inherit from, and Longhorn inherited from XP (later Server 2003). It was called Windows Longhorn Professional at first, after Windows XP Professional. They may just have replaced the "XP" part with the "Longhorn" text and not caring more about that. This is just about alphas. Ulterior motives on marketing usually come much later than the very early tech previews. QUOTE I could easily make these "screenshots" in Photoshop, probably in better quality too. Yes, sure, many probably could. -------------------- MacBook Pro, Rev. F • Mac OS X "Leopard" 10.5.8
|
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 12:07 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Forum Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Forum Guru Posts: 1,221 Joined: 23-November 04 Member No.: 355 |
It's good to be a skeptic, but everyone I talked to says it is 100% real...
I trust what they say untill proven otherwise.. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 12:10 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Member Posts: 30 Joined: 3-January 07 From: Birmingham UK Member No.: 8,509 |
You have got o realise this is an early version. It probably is just at the moment Windows Vista running on top of the Windows7 kernel - thats all. Things like new GUI will be added later when its ready, they just testing the nuts and bolts before everything else.
I believe we will see something similar to the early longhorn builds - like the sidebar beign part of the shell etc. |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 01:11 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Forum Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Forum Guru Posts: 1,221 Joined: 23-November 04 Member No.: 355 |
The first build of Longhorn only had minor changes in the explorer, the bootscreen and the loginscreen. It was just XP with some very small features
After that build we met the sidebar and the plex theme, and I guess that was the M3 build. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 01:41 PM
Post
#26
|
|
![]() Forum Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Forum Guru Posts: 634 Joined: 19-December 05 From: Poland Member No.: 1,444 I'm running: Vista in Fusion on Leopard on PC ! |
-------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 02:00 PM
Post
#27
|
|
![]() Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Loyal Member Posts: 264 Joined: 29-December 06 From: Daly City, CA Member No.: 8,458 I'm running: Windows NT 5.1.2600 (no need to upgrade) ;) |
Well, now there's more proof. I doubt Microsoft will tolerate this. -------------------- Happy AeroXP day to me!
Join the Windows 7 Yahoo! Group! |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 02:03 PM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Loyal Member Posts: 121 Joined: 11-January 08 From: UK Member No.: 28,280 I'm running: Vista Home Premium |
I doubt Microsoft will tolerate this. No chance, it'll be removed from YouTube soon. Anyone who has the software - download it -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 02:04 PM
Post
#29
|
|
![]() Forum Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Forum Guru Posts: 634 Joined: 19-December 05 From: Poland Member No.: 1,444 I'm running: Vista in Fusion on Leopard on PC ! |
I doubt Microsoft will tolerate this. No chance, it'll be removed from YouTube soon. Anyone who has the software - download it It is secure now: http://rapidshare.com/files/86502784/Blue_...lleled.rar.html http://www.megaupload.com/?d=71XQODX0 -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 02:28 PM
Post
#30
|
|
|
^ Just imagine there's an avatar there for now ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Forum Guru Posts: 593 Joined: 25-January 06 From: Ontario, Canada Member No.: 1,887 I'm running: Ubuntu 9.10 |
Idk... Looking at it, it doesn't seem real. It is almost a carbon copy of vista, with some new numbers. And in the Windows 7 thing, it says 6.1. Kinda doesnt make sense when it is Windows 7, not 6. Also... No one but me finds Windows 7 Ultimate a bit unbelieveable? If this was a M1 release, there would be no ultimate. There would be 1 version. Thats it. Not this Multi-version crap. That's not something you do till the end. In all of the Vista Beta's I tried (when it was Longhorn), I don't remember there being a Longhorn Ultimate right at the beginning. Do you? My vote is fake. I could easily make these "screenshots" in Photoshop, probably in better quality too. But thats just on persons opinion. We are all entitled to our own thoughts. Don't you remember the earlier Longhorn Betas? They were called "Longhorn XP Professional". And I think enough people have confirmed that these are legit for us now. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th November 2009 - 10:58 PM |