<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7: Introducing WinFX, minus .NET?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/</link>
	<description>Windows Enthusiast Community</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Redmond Pie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows 7 = Longhorn Flashback ??</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Redmond Pie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows 7 = Longhorn Flashback ??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/?p=77#comment-316</guid>
		<description>[...] to AeroXp, Microsoft is building an unmanaged version of WinFX (at least the WPF and WCF components of it), [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to AeroXp, Microsoft is building an unmanaged version of WinFX (at least the WPF and WCF components of it), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elderly Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Elderly Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/?p=77#comment-309</guid>
		<description>For all of the information being leaked about Windows 7 is that it absolutely must be an unequivocal success.  If Win7 or whatever name it has when it arrives is another flop as is Vista, there will be an exodus of users not seen since Moses led his flock from Egypt.  In my opinion, most of them will be heading for Apple.  Some may straggle over to Linux but I believe Apple will prove the stronger lure, despite it's higher price.

As an IBM retiree, the thought of owning an Apple sticks in my throat a bit but I believe I would check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all of the information being leaked about Windows 7 is that it absolutely must be an unequivocal success.  If Win7 or whatever name it has when it arrives is another flop as is Vista, there will be an exodus of users not seen since Moses led his flock from Egypt.  In my opinion, most of them will be heading for Apple.  Some may straggle over to Linux but I believe Apple will prove the stronger lure, despite it&#8217;s higher price.</p>
<p>As an IBM retiree, the thought of owning an Apple sticks in my throat a bit but I believe I would check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boz</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>boz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/?p=77#comment-300</guid>
		<description>.NET versions are becoming the VB runtime DLL's of the new milleneum (except the download is 100x as big!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.NET versions are becoming the VB runtime DLL&#8217;s of the new milleneum (except the download is 100x as big!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7: Yeni grafik efektleriyle dolu &#124; Shevko Kişisel Web Sayfası</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7: Yeni grafik efektleriyle dolu &#124; Shevko Kişisel Web Sayfası</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/?p=77#comment-289</guid>
		<description>[...] Vista halefi Windows 7, ciddi anlamda iyileştirilmiş grafik efektleri ile karşımıza çıkabilir. Bu iddianın gerekçesi ise Microsoft&#8217;un Professional Developer Conference (PDC2008) etkinliğindeki içeriğin duyurulması oluyor. Haberin kaynağı AeroXperience-Blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vista halefi Windows 7, ciddi anlamda iyileştirilmiş grafik efektleri ile karşımıza çıkabilir. Bu iddianın gerekçesi ise Microsoft&#8217;un Professional Developer Conference (PDC2008) etkinliğindeki içeriğin duyurulması oluyor. Haberin kaynağı AeroXperience-Blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian.shapiro</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>brian.shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/?p=77#comment-288</guid>
		<description>I've been using .NET 3.5 SP1, and I've found the new Effects class, but I've also noticed that in overriding the OnRender method, you're still restricted by PushEffect to use BitmapEffects, and not effects with hardware acceleration. Also, I'm not sure why Microsoft chose not to include a hardware accelerated version of OuterGlow, its probably more useful than DropShadow, especially since it can replicate the shadowing used for Aero windows when DropShadow can't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using .NET 3.5 SP1, and I&#8217;ve found the new Effects class, but I&#8217;ve also noticed that in overriding the OnRender method, you&#8217;re still restricted by PushEffect to use BitmapEffects, and not effects with hardware acceleration. Also, I&#8217;m not sure why Microsoft chose not to include a hardware accelerated version of OuterGlow, its probably more useful than DropShadow, especially since it can replicate the shadowing used for Aero windows when DropShadow can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Антон Палёк : По дороге к Midori: RedHawk, MinSafe and Sapphire</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Антон Палёк : По дороге к Midori: RedHawk, MinSafe and Sapphire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/?p=77#comment-286</guid>
		<description>[...] октября этого года. Платформа будет представлена как "WinFX минус .Net". Эту платформу описывают еще одним кодовым названием: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] октября этого года. Платформа будет представлена как &#8220;WinFX минус .Net&#8221;. Эту платформу описывают еще одним кодовым названием: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R2X2 - Blogs and News for real nerds.. &#187; On the road to Midori: RedHawk, MinSafe and Sapphire</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>R2X2 - Blogs and News for real nerds.. &#187; On the road to Midori: RedHawk, MinSafe and Sapphire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/?p=77#comment-280</guid>
		<description>[...] is planning to detail at its Professional Developers Conference (PDC) in late October — as “WinFX minus .Net.” I’ve heard this unmanaged services platform described by yet another codename: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is planning to detail at its Professional Developers Conference (PDC) in late October — as “WinFX minus .Net.” I’ve heard this unmanaged services platform described by yet another codename: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All about Microsoft mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>All about Microsoft mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/?p=77#comment-279</guid>
		<description>[...] is planning to detail at its Professional Developers Conference (PDC) in late October &#8212; as &#8220;WinFX minus .Net.&#8221; I&#8217;ve heard this unmanaged services platform described by yet another codename: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is planning to detail at its Professional Developers Conference (PDC) in late October &#8212; as &#8220;WinFX minus .Net.&#8221; I&#8217;ve heard this unmanaged services platform described by yet another codename: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nexus</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Nexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/?p=77#comment-267</guid>
		<description>well i dont know too much anymore but heres to hoping that first one means we will get per application DPI resizing capability back in the OS that was displayed in the old vista builds (regardless of the 'd' word and vector graphics).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i dont know too much anymore but heres to hoping that first one means we will get per application DPI resizing capability back in the OS that was displayed in the old vista builds (regardless of the &#8216;d&#8217; word and vector graphics).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winlonghorn</title>
		<link>http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/06/windows-7-introducing-winfx-minus-net/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Winlonghorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/?p=77#comment-247</guid>
		<description>I am not even going to argue with Don about his post, but I will say this much. Don is wrong on so many levels! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not even going to argue with Don about his post, but I will say this much. Don is wrong on so many levels! <img src='http://www.aeroxp.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
