blogforumabout

Anandtech gets their Solid Snake on, procures Nehalem

Anandtech are getting some vibes from next week’s Metal Gear Solid 4 launch and getting their stealth suit on for a mission involving getting unauthorised access to Intel’s upcoming Nehalem processor and benchmarking it for the world and his granny to see.

In a word, Nehalem is major. The motherboard they had to test on had bugs limiting performance in memory and GPU related areas, but Nehalem nonetheless manages to well and truly top-trump a higher-clocked Penryn in every test. A 2.66Ghz Nehalem boasts a 20-50% performance increase over the 3.2Ghz Penryn, currently the fastest processor on the market. And that’s not as high as this thing will clock.

Check out the article for yourself, but here are a few quotes to whet your apetite:

  • Memory accesses on Conroe/Penryn were quick due to Intel’s very aggressive prefetchers, memory accesses on Nehalem are just plain fast. Nehalem takes a little over 2/3 the time to complete a memory request as Penryn”
  • In short: Nehalem can get data out of memory quick like bunnies.”
  • Clock for clock, Nehalem is nearly 28% faster than Penryn in our DivX test. Even better is when you put this performance in perspective: at 2.66GHz Nehalem is faster than the fastest Penryn available today the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 running at 3.2GHz. At 3.2GHz, Nehalem will be fast”
  • It’s months before Nehalem’s launch and there’s already no equal in sight, it will take far more than Phenom to make this thing sweat.”

Read the Article at Anandtech

Tags: , , ,

22 Responses to “Anandtech gets their Solid Snake on, procures Nehalem”

  1. Intel’s Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn at Electronics Review And Update Says:

    [...] — which hopefully means Nehalem will be even faster when it’s out for real. Your move, AMD.[Via AeroXperience]Read | Permalink | Email [...]

  2. Intel’s Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn | Tech-Mania Revolution! Says:

    [...] — which hopefully means Nehalem will be even faster when it’s out for real. Your move, AMD.[Via AeroXperience]Read | Permalink | Email [...]

  3. Intel’s Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn | gadget news Says:

    [...] — which hopefully means Nehalem will be even faster when it’s out for real. Your move, AMD.[Via AeroXperience]Read | Permalink | Email [...]

  4. Intel’s Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn : arnsteinblogg 2.0 Says:

    [...] — which hopefully means Nehalem will be even faster when it’s out for real. Your move, AMD.[Via AeroXperience]Read | Permalink | Email [...]

  5. B On The Move - Tech News » Blog Archive » Intel’s Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  6. Intel’s Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn | PhetchIt - Only The Best of the Web. Says:

    [...] — which hopefully means Nehalem will be even faster when it’s out for real. Your move, AMD.[Via AeroXperience]Read | Permalink | Email [...]

  7. Engadget » Blog Archive » Intel’s Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  8. Intel's Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn | Technology Blog Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  9. Your Gadget Guide » Blog Archive » Intel’s Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  10. Intel's Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn | BlogNerds Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  11. Intel’s Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  12. Intel’s Nehalem benchmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  13. Intel’s Nehalem benchmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn | Leopard O.S. Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  14. B On The Move - Tech News » Blog Archive » Intel’s Nehalem benchmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  15. Intel’s Nehalem bechmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn | Leopard O.S. Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  16. Intel's Nehalem benchmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn » Developages - Development and Technology Blog Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  17. Engadget » Blog Archive » Intel’s Nehalem benchmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  18. Intel's Nehalem benchmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn | Technology Blog Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  19. Intel’s Nehalem benchmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn | blogGadgets.nl Says:

    [...] [Via AeroXperience] [...]

  20. Intel’s Nehalem benchmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn | NewsMeToday Says:

    [...] which hopefully means Nehalem will be even faster when it’s out for real. Your move, AMD.[Via AeroXperience]Read | Permalink | Email [...]

  21. Sri Says:

    typo nitpick: “Read the Article at Ars” link at the end of the post - the article’s at Anandtech, not ArsTechnica

  22. Sam Johnson Says:

    Thanks Sri, fixed :)

Leave a Reply